Diagnosing glaucoma in primary eye care and the role of Artificial Intelligence applications for reducing the prevalence of undetected glaucoma in Australia

  • Wong EY, Keeffe JE, Rait JL, Vu HT, Le A, McCarty PhD C, et al. Detection of undiagnosed glaucoma by eye health professionals. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1508–14.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull world health Organ. 2004;82:844–51.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:614–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV. et al.Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–34.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • The Department of Health. Australia Government. Visual impairment and blindness in Australia, Dec 2008. (accessed March 2023).

  • Rotchford AP, Kirwan JF, Muller MA, Johnson GJ, Roux P. Temba glaucoma study: a population-based cross-sectional survey in urban South Africa. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:376–82.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh Z, Yu M, Betzler BK, Majithia S, Thakur S, Tham YC, et al. The global extent of undetected glaucoma in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1393–404.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua J, Baskaran M, Ong PG, Zheng Y, Wong TY, Aung T, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and visual features of undiagnosed glaucoma: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:938–46.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Harris A, Koskosas A, Founti P, Gong G, et al. Factors associated with undiagnosed open-angle glaucoma: the Thessaloniki eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:327–35.e1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh Y, Yu F, Coleman AL. Burden of undetected and untreated glaucoma in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:1121–9.e1.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakata K, Sakata LM, Sakata VM, Santini C, Hopker LM, Bernardes R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a South brazilian population: projeto glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4974–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensor MD, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL, Livingston PM, Taylor HR. The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne visual impairment project. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:733–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman J, Xie J, Keel S, Ang GS, Lee PY, Bourne R, et al. Prevalence and causes of unilateral vision impairment and unilateral blindness in Australia: the National Eye Health Survey. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:240–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J, Lee PY, Alwan M, Fahy ET, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Australian national eye health survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:191–5.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’neill EC, Danesh-Meyer HV, Kong GX, Hewitt AW, Coote MA, Mackey DA, et al. Optic disc evaluation in optic neuropathies: the optic disc assessment project. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:964–70.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier PC, Funk J, Schwarzer G, Antes G, Falck-Ytter YT. Treatment of ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2005;331:134.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. Jama. 2014;311:1901–11.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan HH, Ong DN, Kong YX, O’Neill EC, Pandav SS, Coote MA, et al. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:936–44.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreb RN, Leung CKS, Crowston JG, Medeiros FA, Friedman DS, Wiggs JL, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim Engl. 2016;2:16067.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer J, Vianna JR, Chauhan BC, Quigley HA. Toward a new definition of glaucomatous optic neuropathy for clinical research. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31:85–90.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan BC, O’leary N, AlMobarak FA, Reis A, Yang H, Sharpe GP, et al. Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:535–43.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jampel HD, Singh K, Lin SC, Chen TC, Francis BA, Hodapp E, et al. Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:986–1002.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury JM, Donahue SP, Lavin PJ, Tsai JC. Comparison of 24-2 and 30-2 perimetry in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies. J Neuroophthalmol. 1999;19:100–8.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yenice O, Temel A. Evaluation of two Humphrey perimetry programs: full threshold and SITA standard testing strategy for learning effect. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005;15:209–12.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan AC, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:569–73.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF. Intervals between visual field tests when monitoring the glaucomatous patient: wait-and-see approach. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2770–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Garway-Heath DF, Quartilho A, Prah P, Crabb DP, Cheng Q, Zhu H. Evaluation of visual field and imaging outcomes for glaucoma clinical trials (an American Ophthalomological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2017;115:115.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Commonwealth Fund. International Profiles of Health Care Systems. Available at Accessed 20 Jul 2023.

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2023) Cancer screening programs: quarterly data, AIHW, Australian Government, (Accessed 20 Jul 2023).

  • Optometry Australia. Accessed 27 Jan 2022.

  • Optometry Board of Australia. Accessed 4 Feb 2022.

  • Optometry Australia. A decade on the PBS and nearly 100,000 scripts a year. Accessed 25 Jul 2023

  • Optometry Board of Australia. Optometry Guidelines for Use of Scheduled Medicines. 2018. (accessed 13 March 2023).

  • Evidence reviews for selective laser trabeculoplasty in ocular hypertension or chronic open-angle glaucoma adult patients: Glaucoma: diagnosis and management: Evidence review A. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022.

  • Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1505–16.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Health. MBS Online: Medicare Benefits Schedule. 2020. Accessed 26 Apr 2022.

  • Ford BK, Kim D, Keay L, White AJ. Glaucoma referrals from primary care and subsequent hospital management in an urban Australian hospital. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103:821–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot B, MacEwen C. Surveillance of sight loss due to delay in ophthalmic treatment or review: frequency, cause and outcome. Eye. 2017;31:771–5.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison K, Patel D, Alabi O. Epidemiology of glaucoma: the past, present, and predictions for the future. Cureus. 2020;12:e11686.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman JM, Bentley SA, Armitage JA, Woods CA. Could adoption of the rural pipeline concept redress Australian optometry workforce issues? Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102:566–70.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeffe JE, Weih LM, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Utilisation of eye care services by urban and rural Australians. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:24–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr J, Mowatt G, Hernández R, Siddiqui M, Cook J, Lourenco T, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:1–190.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • US Preventive Services Task F, Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Nicholson WK, Cabana M, Chelmow D, et al. Screening for primary open-angle glaucoma: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2022;327:1992–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomey M, Ho KC, Gyawali R, Stapleton F, Wiles L, Hibbert P, et al. The appropriateness of and barriers to glaucoma care delivery by Australian optometrists. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;105:1–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam AR, Andrews C, Musch DC, Lee PP, Stein JD. Large disparities in receipt of glaucoma care between enrollees in Medicaid and those with commercial health insurance. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1442–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein JD, Talwar N, LaVerne AM, Nan B, Lichter PR. Racial disparities in the use of ancillary testing to evaluate individuals with open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1579–88.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Deep Blue Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Tromp J, Farnebäck G. Combinatorics of go. International Conference on Computers and Games. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2006. p. 84–99.

  • Lee KF. AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin; 2018.

  • Silver D, Schrittwieser J, Simonyan K, Antonoglou I, Huang A, Guez A, et al. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature. 2017;550:354–9.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Kopf AW, Polsky D. ABCDE-an evolving concept in the early detection of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1032–4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Tranchand P, Berard F, Secchi T, Colin C, Moulin G. Semiological value of ABCDE criteria in the diagnosis of cutaneous pigmented tumors. Dermatology. 1998;197:11–7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, Patton T, English JC, Ho J, et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:422–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abràmoff MD, Lou Y, Erginay A, Clarida W, Amelon R, Folk JC, et al. Improved automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on a publicly available dataset through integration of deep learning. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:5200–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehteshami Bejnordi B, Veta M, Johannes van Diest P, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, Litjens G, et al. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. Jama. 2017;318:2199–210.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Manak MS, Varsanik JS, Hogan BJ, Whitfield MJ, Su WR, Joshi N, et al. Live-cell phenotypic-biomarker microfluidic assay for the risk stratification of cancer patients via machine learning. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2:761–72.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani P, Sundaram B. Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology. 2017;284:574–82.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA permits marketing of AI software that autonomously detects diabetic retinopathy. (Accessed 10 July 2023).

  • Fan Z, Rong Y, Cai X, Lu J, Li W, Lin H, et al. Optic disk detection in fundus image based on structured learning. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2018;22:224–34.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookiah MR, Acharya UR, Chua CK, Min LC, Ng EY, Mushrif MM, et al. Automated detection of optic disk in retinal fundus images using intuitionistic fuzzy histon segmentation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 2013;227:37–49.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li L, Wormstone IM, Qiao C, Zhang C, Liu P, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy using fundus photographs. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137:1353–60.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros FA, Jammal AA, Thompson AC. From machine to machine: an OCT-trained deep learning algorithm for objective quantification of glaucomatous damage in fundus photographs. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:513–21.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AC, Jammal AA, Medeiros FA. A deep learning algorithm to quantify neuroretinal rim loss from optic disc photographs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;201:9–18.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammal AA, Thompson AC, Mariottoni EB, Berchuck SI, Urata CN, Estrela T, et al. Human versus machine: comparing a deep learning algorithm to human gradings for detecting glaucoma on fundus photographs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;211:123–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavendra U, Fujita H, Bhandary SV, Gudigar A, Tan JH, Acharya UR. Deep convolution neural network for accurate diagnosis of glaucoma using digital fundus images. Inf Sci. 2018;441:41–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, He Y, Keel S, Meng W, Chang RT, He M. Efficacy of a deep learning system for detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy based on color fundus photographs. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1199–206.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:ii15–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang ML, Chen HY. Development and comparison of automated classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4121–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Naithani P, Sihota R, Sony P, Dada T, Gupta V, Kondal D, et al. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3138–45.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barella KA, Costa VP, Gonçalves Vidotti V, Silva FR, Dias M, Gomi ES. Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers using retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve data from SD-OCT. J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:789129.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizios D, Heijl A, Hougaard JL, Bengtsson B. Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis based on classification of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness parameters measured by Stratus OCT. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88:44–52.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrosa JM, Polo V, Ferreras A, García-Martín E, Calvo P, Pablo LE. Neural network analysis of different segmentation strategies of nerve fiber layer assessment for glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:672–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad H, Fuchs TJ, De Cuir N, De Moraes CG, Blumberg DM, Liebmann JM, et al. Hybrid deep learning on single wide-field optical coherence tomography scans accurately classifies glaucoma suspects. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:1086–94.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, Folio LS, Nadler Z, et al. Three-dimensional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography data analysis for glaucoma detection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55476.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Chu T, Ramsey JD, Glymour C, Noecker RJ, et al. Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4147–52.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maetschke S, Antony B, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, Schuman J, Garnavi R. A feature agnostic approach for glaucoma detection in OCT volumes. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219126.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Heijl A, Bizios D, Bengtsson B. Comparison of clinicians and an artificial neural network regarding accuracy and certainty in performance of visual field assessment for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:413–7.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaoka R, Murata H, Iwase A, Araie M. Detecting preperimetric glaucoma with standard automated perimetry using a deep learning classifier. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1974–80.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Balasubramanian M, Lee I, Jang G, Yousefi S, et al. Glaucomatous patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85941.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai S, Elze T, Bex PJ, Wiggs JL, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ. Clinical correlates of computationally derived visual field defect archetypes in patients from a glaucoma clinic. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42:568–74.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, White H, Côlt B, Raphaelian P, Fechtner RD, et al. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3362–73.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wang Z, Qu G, Song D, Yuan Y, Xu Y, et al. Automatic differentiation of Glaucoma visual field from non-glaucoma visual filed using deep convolutional neural network. BMC Med Imaging. 2018;18:35.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizios D, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Integration and fusion of standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography data for improved automated glaucoma diagnostics. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:20.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • What is MRF Visual Field Test? Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Wu M, Leng T, de Sisternes L, Rubin DL, Chen Q. Automated segmentation of optic disc in SD-OCT images and cup-to-disc ratios quantification by patch searching-based neural canal opening detection. Opt Express. 2015;23:31216–29.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu T, Devi S, Venkatesh R. Optic nerve head segmentation using fundus images and optical coherence tomography images for glaucoma detection. Biomed Pap. 2015;159:607–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim WS, Ho H-Y, Ho H-C, Chen YW, Lee CK, Chen PJ, et al. Use of multimodal dataset in AI for detecting glaucoma based on fundus photographs assessed with OCT: focus group study on high prevalence of myopia. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22:1–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong J, Li F, Song D, Tang G, He J, Gao K, et al. Multimodal machine learning using visual fields and peripapillary circular OCT scans in detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 2022;129:171–80.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick HB, Schultz T, Gerste RD. Miniaturization in glaucoma monitoring and treatment: a review of new technologies that require a minimal surgical approach. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8:19–30.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’neill EC, Gurria LU, Pandav SS, Kong YX, Brennan JF, Xie J, et al. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation project: factors associated with underestimation of glaucoma likelihood. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:560–6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinical Practice Guide for the Diagnosis and Management of Open Angle Glaucoma 2020. (Accessed 13 March 2023).

  • Shen N, Bernier T, Sequeira L, Strauss J, Silver MP, Carter-Langford A, et al. Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;125:1–12.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia MA, Trang E, Agar A, Vingrys AJ, Hepschke J, Kong GY, et al. Screening for glaucomatous visual field defects in rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2021;15:125–31.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, SJ & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2021).

  • Murphy, KP & Bach F Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  • Goodfellow, I, Bengio, Y, Courville, A & Bengio, Y Deep Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016).

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *