Hoy, D. et al. The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 73, 968–974. (2014).
Google Scholar
Son, S., Yoo, B. R., Kim, H. J., Song, S. K. & Ahn, Y. Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in elderly patients over 65 years of age compared to young adults. Neurospine 20, 597–607. (2023).
Google Scholar
Ravindra, V. M. et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: Estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Glob. Spine J. 8, 784–794. (2018).
Google Scholar
Ambrosio, L. et al. The effect of transitioning to remote working in patients affected by chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Neurospine 20, 692–700. (2023).
Google Scholar
Jacobs, W. C. H., Rubinstein, S. M., Koes, B., van Tulder, M. W. & Peul, W. C. Evidence for surgery in degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 27, 673–684. (2013).
Google Scholar
Kluba, T., Dikmenli, G., Dietz, K., Giehl, J. P. & Niemeyer, T. Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 129, 1–5. (2009).
Google Scholar
Lee, N. et al. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 101, 216–226. (2017).
Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A., Roffey, D. M., Chow, D., Alkherayf, F. & Wai, E. K. A systematic review of preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes following lumbar discectomy. Spine J. 16, 1413–1422. (2016).
Google Scholar
Rushton, A., Zoulas, K., Powell, A. & Staal, J. B. Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 19, 326. (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Perioperative clinical features and long-term prognosis after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation, or OLIF with percutaneous pedicle fixation: A comprehensive treatment strategy for patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Neurospine 20, 536–549. (2023).
Google Scholar
Heindel, P. et al. Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, e496–e501 (2017).
Ghogawala, Z. et al. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 1, 267–272. (2004).
Google Scholar
Gerling, M. C. et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis: A subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41, 901–909 (2016).
Thomé, C. et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 3, 129–141. (2005).
Google Scholar
Sato, S. et al. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J. 15, 1536–1544. (2015).
Google Scholar
McGirt, M. J. et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64, 338–344 (2009) (discussion 344–345).
Chang, C.-C. et al. Comparison of cortical bone trajectory to pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: An analysis of 291 patients. Neurospine 20, 308–316. (2023).
Google Scholar
Montenegro, T. S. et al. Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: An observational cohort study. J. Neurosurg. Spine 35, 437–445. (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. S. & Michelsen, C. B. Revision surgery for failed back surgery syndrome. Spine 17, 957 (1992).
Bonano, J. et al. Economic impact of revision operations for adjacent segment disease of the subaxial cervical spine. JAAOS Glob. Res. Rev. 6, 58 (2022).
Wang, H., Yu, H., Zhang, N. & Xiang, L. Incidence, risk factors, and management of postoperative hematoma following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical diseases. Neurospine 20, 525–535. (2023).
Google Scholar
Rajaee, S. S., Kanim, L. E. & Bae, H. W. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: Patient characteristics and complications. Bone Jt. J. 96-b, 807–816 (2014).
Kim, C. H. et al. The selection of open or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy according to an age cut-off point: Nationwide Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40, E1063–E1070 (2015).
Kim, C. H. et al. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: A nationwide cohort study. Spine J. 13, 1230–1237. (2013).
Google Scholar
Kim, C. H. et al. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 581–590 (2013).
Lee, C. H., Chung, C. K., Kim, C. H. & Kwon, J. W. Health care burden of spinal diseases in the Republic of Korea: Analysis of a nationwide database from 2012 through 2016. Neurospine 15, 66–76. (2018).
Google Scholar
Kim, C. H. et al. Increased volume of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and changes in surgical methods and outcomes: A nationwide cohort study with a 5-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 119, e313–e322. (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Lee, J. S., Park, S. H., Shin, S. A. & Kim, K. Cohort profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). South Korea. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, e15. (2017).
Google Scholar
Kim, C. H. et al. Increased volume of lumbar surgeries for herniated intervertebral disc disease and cost-effectiveness analysis: A nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43, 585–593 (2018).
Kim, C. H. et al. Direct medical costs after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: A nationwide matched cohort study with a 10-year follow-up. PLoS One 16, e0260460. (2021).
Google Scholar
Martin, B. I. et al. Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39, 769–779 (2014).
Kim, C. H. et al. The long-term reoperation rate following surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study with a 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44, 1382–1389 (2019).
Huang, W., Han, Z., Liu, J., Yu, L. & Yu, X. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95, e2378 (2016).
Zhu, F. et al. Moderate to severe multifidus fatty atrophy is the risk factor for recurrence after microdiscectomy of lumbar disc herniation. Neurospine 20, 637–650. (2023).
Google Scholar
Jansson, K. A., Németh, G., Granath, F. & Blomqvist, P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years—A national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur. Spine J. 14, 659–663. (2005).
Google Scholar
Park, S.-J. et al. Indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion revision surgery following previous posterior decompression: comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between direct and indirect decompression revision surgery. Neurospine 19, 544–554. (2022).
Google Scholar
Martin, B. I. et al. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 382–387 (2007).
Weinstein, J. N. et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35, 1329–1338 (2010).
Radcliff, K. et al. Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 531–539 (2013).
Hazard, R. G. Failed back surgery syndrome: surgical and nonsurgical approaches. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 443, 228–232. (2006).
Google Scholar
Blumenthal, C. et al. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 18, 340–346. (2013).
Google Scholar
Gerling, M. C. et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for degenerative spondylolisthesis: A subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, 1559–1569 (2017).
Okuda, S. et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29, 1535–1540 (2004).
Geurts, J. W., Willems, P. C., Kallewaard, J. W., van Kleef, M. & Dirksen, C. The impact of chronic discogenic low back pain: Costs and patients’ burden. Pain Res. Manag. 2018, 4696180. (2018).
Google Scholar
Martin, B. I. et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. Jama 299, 656–664. (2008).
Google Scholar
Vassilaki, M. & Hurwitz, E. L. Insights in public health: Perspectives on pain in the low back and neck: Global burden, epidemiology, and management. Hawaii J. Med. Public Health 73, 122–126 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hurwitz, E. L., Randhawa, K., Yu, H., Côté, P. & Haldeman, S. The Global Spine Care Initiative: A summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur. Spine J. 27, 796–801. (2018).
Google Scholar
Alonso-García, M. & Sarría-Santamera, A. The economic and social burden of low back pain in Spain: A national assessment of the economic and social impact of low back pain in Spain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45, E1026–E1032 (2020).
Nolte, M. T. et al. Change in patient-reported outcome measures as predictors of revision lumbar decompression procedures. Neurospine 18, 863–870. (2021).
Google Scholar
Jacob, C. et al. Claims data analysis on the annual frequency and incremental cost of reoperations in instrumental spinal surgeries in Germany. Value Health 17, A376. (2014).
Google Scholar
link