Screening patients requiring secondary lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a nationwide sample cohort study

  • Hoy, D. et al. The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 73, 968–974. (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, S., Yoo, B. R., Kim, H. J., Song, S. K. & Ahn, Y. Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in elderly patients over 65 years of age compared to young adults. Neurospine 20, 597–607. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindra, V. M. et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: Estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Glob. Spine J. 8, 784–794. (2018).

    Article 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, L. et al. The effect of transitioning to remote working in patients affected by chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Neurospine 20, 692–700. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, W. C. H., Rubinstein, S. M., Koes, B., van Tulder, M. W. & Peul, W. C. Evidence for surgery in degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 27, 673–684. (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluba, T., Dikmenli, G., Dietz, K., Giehl, J. P. & Niemeyer, T. Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 129, 1–5. (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. et al. Comparison of outcomes of anterior, posterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg. 101, 216–226. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. A., Roffey, D. M., Chow, D., Alkherayf, F. & Wai, E. K. A systematic review of preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcomes following lumbar discectomy. Spine J. 16, 1413–1422. (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, A., Zoulas, K., Powell, A. & Staal, J. B. Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 19, 326. (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. et al. Perioperative clinical features and long-term prognosis after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation, or OLIF with percutaneous pedicle fixation: A comprehensive treatment strategy for patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Neurospine 20, 536–549. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heindel, P. et al. Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, e496–e501 (2017).

  • Ghogawala, Z. et al. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 1, 267–272. (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, M. C. et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis: A subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41, 901–909 (2016).

  • Thomé, C. et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 3, 129–141. (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, S. et al. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J. 15, 1536–1544. (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • McGirt, M. J. et al. Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64, 338–344 (2009) (discussion 344–345).

  • Chang, C.-C. et al. Comparison of cortical bone trajectory to pedicle-based dynamic stabilization: An analysis of 291 patients. Neurospine 20, 308–316. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro, T. S. et al. Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: An observational cohort study. J. Neurosurg. Spine 35, 437–445. (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. S. & Michelsen, C. B. Revision surgery for failed back surgery syndrome. Spine 17, 957 (1992).

  • Bonano, J. et al. Economic impact of revision operations for adjacent segment disease of the subaxial cervical spine. JAAOS Glob. Res. Rev. 6, 58 (2022).

  • Wang, H., Yu, H., Zhang, N. & Xiang, L. Incidence, risk factors, and management of postoperative hematoma following anterior cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical diseases. Neurospine 20, 525–535. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee, S. S., Kanim, L. E. & Bae, H. W. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: Patient characteristics and complications. Bone Jt. J. 96-b, 807–816 (2014).

  • Kim, C. H. et al. The selection of open or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy according to an age cut-off point: Nationwide Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40, E1063–E1070 (2015).

  • Kim, C. H. et al. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: A nationwide cohort study. Spine J. 13, 1230–1237. (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. H. et al. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 581–590 (2013).

  • Lee, C. H., Chung, C. K., Kim, C. H. & Kwon, J. W. Health care burden of spinal diseases in the Republic of Korea: Analysis of a nationwide database from 2012 through 2016. Neurospine 15, 66–76. (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. H. et al. Increased volume of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and changes in surgical methods and outcomes: A nationwide cohort study with a 5-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 119, e313–e322. (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lee, J. S., Park, S. H., Shin, S. A. & Kim, K. Cohort profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). South Korea. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, e15. (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. H. et al. Increased volume of lumbar surgeries for herniated intervertebral disc disease and cost-effectiveness analysis: A nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43, 585–593 (2018).

  • Kim, C. H. et al. Direct medical costs after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: A nationwide matched cohort study with a 10-year follow-up. PLoS One 16, e0260460. (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. I. et al. Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39, 769–779 (2014).

  • Kim, C. H. et al. The long-term reoperation rate following surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: A Nationwide Sample Cohort Study with a 10-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44, 1382–1389 (2019).

  • Huang, W., Han, Z., Liu, J., Yu, L. & Yu, X. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95, e2378 (2016).

  • Zhu, F. et al. Moderate to severe multifidus fatty atrophy is the risk factor for recurrence after microdiscectomy of lumbar disc herniation. Neurospine 20, 637–650. (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, K. A., Németh, G., Granath, F. & Blomqvist, P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years—A national analysis of 9,664 operations. Eur. Spine J. 14, 659–663. (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.-J. et al. Indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion revision surgery following previous posterior decompression: comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between direct and indirect decompression revision surgery. Neurospine 19, 544–554. (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. I. et al. Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32, 382–387 (2007).

  • Weinstein, J. N. et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35, 1329–1338 (2010).

  • Radcliff, K. et al. Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, 531–539 (2013).

  • Hazard, R. G. Failed back surgery syndrome: surgical and nonsurgical approaches. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 443, 228–232. (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, C. et al. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 18, 340–346. (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, M. C. et al. Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for degenerative spondylolisthesis: A subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42, 1559–1569 (2017).

  • Okuda, S. et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29, 1535–1540 (2004).

  • Geurts, J. W., Willems, P. C., Kallewaard, J. W., van Kleef, M. & Dirksen, C. The impact of chronic discogenic low back pain: Costs and patients’ burden. Pain Res. Manag. 2018, 4696180. (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. I. et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. Jama 299, 656–664. (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilaki, M. & Hurwitz, E. L. Insights in public health: Perspectives on pain in the low back and neck: Global burden, epidemiology, and management. Hawaii J. Med. Public Health 73, 122–126 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, E. L., Randhawa, K., Yu, H., Côté, P. & Haldeman, S. The Global Spine Care Initiative: A summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur. Spine J. 27, 796–801. (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-García, M. & Sarría-Santamera, A. The economic and social burden of low back pain in Spain: A national assessment of the economic and social impact of low back pain in Spain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45, E1026–E1032 (2020).

  • Nolte, M. T. et al. Change in patient-reported outcome measures as predictors of revision lumbar decompression procedures. Neurospine 18, 863–870. (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, C. et al. Claims data analysis on the annual frequency and incremental cost of reoperations in instrumental spinal surgeries in Germany. Value Health 17, A376. (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *